Everyone who is able might have a gun.Īre we at last brought to such an humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defense? Where is the difference between having our arms under our own possession and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?
Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…The great object is that every man be armed. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Guard with jealous attention the public liberty.
#Dalai lama quotes on guns free#
Those who beat their swords into plowshares usually end up plowing for those who didn’t.Īrms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property… Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them.Ī free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government. What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. They serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants. Laws that forbid the carrying of arms, disarm only those who are neither inclined, nor determined to commit crimes. Here’s what the Founding Fathers actually said about arms: What the Founding Fathers Said About GunsĪ little research showed me that the Second Amendment had more to do with freedom than historical militias. And I still hope that their non-violent methods prevail. guns,Īnd I have long been deeply influenced by leading voices for non-violence, such as Gandhi and King. I was also taught that the government would protect us, and that private gun ownership was the danger. Sure, I knew that the Constitution includes a right to bear arms, but I believed that it was no longer relevant and only applied to a previous era when there were “well-regulated militias”. My parents hated guns, and believed that they only lead to crime and to accidental shootings. But at some other body part, such as a leg. Not at the head, where a fatal wound might result. If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun. Specifically, Mahatma Gandhi wrote in his book, An Autobiography (page 446):Īmong the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest … if we want to learn the use of arms, here is a golden opportunity.Īnd as quoted in the Seattle Times, May 15, 2001, the Dalai Lama said: Digging a little deeper, I was suprised to learn that two of the best-known promoters of nonviolence in history were pro-gun.
0 kommentar(er)
